Written by dustbringer on 01 March 2024 . View source.

Lie Group Examples

Useful results

Proposition 1. Open subsets of (smooth) manifolds are (smooth) manifolds with subset topology.

Proof:

  • Let UMU \subseteq M be open. Then, by definition, for any chart ϕx:UxRn\phi_x: U_x \to \R^n with xUx \in U, ϕx(UUx)\phi_x(U \cap U_x) is open in Rn\R^n. Since ϕx\phi_x is a diffeomorphism onto ϕx(U)\phi_x(U), the restriction ϕxUUx\phi_x|_{U \cap U_x} is a diffeomoprhism onto it's image ϕxUUx(UUx)\phi_x|_{U \cap U_x}(U \cap U_x). Note that UUxU \cap U_x is a precisely the definition of an open neighbourhood of xx in UU (with subset topology from Rn\R^n).
  • Particularly, if (Ux,ϕx)(U_x, \phi_x) is a chart for MM, then (UUx,ϕxUUx)(U \cap U_x, \phi_x|_{U \cap U_x}) is a chart for an open set UMU \subseteq M. Since (topological) subspaces preserve Hausdorff and second countability, UU is a manifold. Specifically, an embedded smooth submanifold of MM.
  • Note: if we replaced "diffeomorphism" with "homeomorphism", the same proof gives the result for general (not-necessarily-smooth) manifolds.

GL(n,R)GL(n, \R)

Real Lie group

The set Mn(R)M_n(\R) of n×nn \times n matrices forms a manifold, by identifying it with Rn2\R^{n^2} with the usual Euclidean topology and trivial charts. Note that this is not a usual matrix group because Mn(R)M_n(\R) contains non-invertible matrices.

The subset GL(n,R)GL(n,\R) ("general linear group") of invertible matrices is a group with matrix multiplication and inverse. To show that it is a smooth manifold, consider the map det:Mn(R)R\op{det}: M_n(\R) \to \R, sending a matrix to it's determinant. This is a polynomial in the entries of the input, so it is a smooth map. Then the preimage GL(n,R):=det1(R0)GL(n,\R) := \op{det}^{-1}(\R \setminus 0) of the open set R0R\R \setminus 0 \subseteq \R is open, and so is a manifold by (Prop 1).

For GL(n,R)GL(n,\R) to be a Lie group, it is left to show that the group multiplication and inverse are smooth maps. Multiplication is smooth because it is a matrix of polynomials in the components of the input. The inverse of a matrix MM is M1=1det(M)adj(M)M^{-1} = \frac{1}{\op{det}(M)} \op{adj}(M) where adj(M)\op{adj}(M) is the adjugate matrix. The adjugate matrix is matrix of polynomials in the input components, and 1/det(M)1/\op{det}(M) is a smooth function because det(M)\op{det}(M) is smooth and non-zero on GL(n,R)GL(n,\R). Hence the inverse operation is also smooth. This implies that GL(n,R)GL(n,\R) is indeed a Lie group.

Compactness

Since this is an embedded submanifold of Mn(R)Rn2M_n(\R) \simeq R^{n^2}, the Heine-Borel theorem says that compactness is equivalent to the statement that the topological space is closed and bounded in the usual norm. This applies to all the other matrix Lie groups we look at.

GL(n,R)GL(n,\R) is not compact.

  • Consider the sequence of matrices {λI}λ>0\{\lambda I\}_{\lambda > 0} where II is the n×nn \times n identity matrix.
  • It is clear that det(λI)=λn>0\op{det}(\lambda I) = \lambda^n > 0, but its Eucildean norm is clearly unbounded. So this sequence in GL(n,R)GL(n,\R) is also unbounded.

GL(n,C)GL(n,\C)

Complex Lie group

Similar to the real case.

Note that this is also a real Lie group, by identifying C=R2\C = \R^2; this forgets some information in C\C.

Compactness

Similar to the real case, this is non-compact.

B(n,R)B(n,\R)

A subgroup of GL(n,R)GL(n,\R), consisting of invertible upper triangular matrices. Alternatively, this consists of linear maps that perserve the flag

0=V0V1Vn=Rn0 = V_0 \subset V_1 \subset \dots \subset V_n = \R^n

where Vi=e1,...,eiV_i = \angl{e_1,...,e_i} with e1,...,ene_1,...,e_n are the standard basis vectors of Rn\R^n, that is a map MM such that Me1,...,Mei=Vi\angl{Me_1, ..., Me_i} = V_i. It is clear that invertible upper trianglular matrices are exactly these, where Me1,...,MeiMe_1, ..., Me_i (the columns of MM) span ViV_i.

Real Lie group

Let UTnUT_n be the set of upper triangular matrices over R\R. This is trivially a manifold by identifying it with Rn(n+1)/2\R^{n(n+1)/2}. Again, by considering the determinant map det:UTn(R)R\op{det}: UT_n(\R) \to \R, we see that B(n,R)=det1(0)UTnB(n,\R) = \op{det}^{-1}(0) \subseteq UT_n is open in UTnUT_n. Hence B(n,R)B(n,\R) is a real manifold by (Prop 1). Similarly (or by extending the result from GL(n,R)GL(n,\R)), the group structure is smooth with respect to this manifold structure, so B(n,R)B(n,\R) is a real Lie group.

Alternative. There is a theorem by Cartan (Closed Subgroup Theorem): Closed subgroups of a Lie group is an embedded manidold with smooth maps. We can see that B(n,R)GL(n,R)B(n,\R) \subseteq GL(n,\R) is clearly a subgroup and is closed because UTnMnUT_n \subseteq M_n is closed (it is a hyperplane in Rn\R^n), and so B(n,R)=GL(n,R)UTnB(n,\R) = GL(n,\R) \cap UT_n is closed in GL(n,R)GL(n,\R). This theorem can be used to prove the other Lie groups as well, but isn't direct enough to satisfy me.

Another argument for this being closed is the following. Consider the projection onto the "lower triangle", f:GL(n,R)Rn(n1)/2f: GL(n,\R) \to \R^{n(n-1)/2} that maps matrices (aij)i,j(a_{ij})_{i,j} to the matrix with just the lower triangle entries (aij,i>j)(a_{ij}, i > j) (and others are zero). This is a projection map so it is continuous. We have that f1({0})=B(n,R)f^{-1}(\{0\}) = B(n,\R), which is closed as {0}\{0\} is closed in R\R.

Compactness B(n,R)B(n,\R) is not compact. The same unbounded sequence we used for GL(n,R)GL(n,\R) is also in B(n,R)B(n,\R).

B(n,C)B(n,\C)

Complex Lie group

Similar to the real case.

Compactness

Similar to the real case, this is non-compact.

SL(n,R)SL(n,\R)

A subgroup of GL(n,R)GL(n,\R), consisting of matrices with determinant 1. That is, volume and orientation preserving linear maps. It is also a normal subgroup of GL(n,R)GL(n,\R) since for ASL(n,R)A \in SL(n,\R) and MGL(n,R)M \in GL(n,\R) we have MAM1SL(n,R)MAM^{-1} \in SL(n,\R), as det(MAM1)=det(M)det(A)det(M)1=det(A)=1\op{det}(MAM^{-1}) = \op{det}(M) \op{det}(A) \op{det}(M)^{-1} = \op{det}(A) = 1.

Real Lie Group

[the rest is being written up...]


Footnotes

  1. 1. ^

    Lee, John M., Introduction to Smooth Manifolds (2012)

Copyright © 2024 dustbringer